Sergio Leone's For a Few Dollars More
Here is the shot for shot remake.
Here is a side by side comparison.
NAME: _Matthew
Taggart_
DATE: _February
26, 2017_
FILM # & TITLE:
_Shot for Shot: For A Few Dollars More_
DP: _Billy
Knowles_
TMA 285 DIRECTOR’S REFLECTION
Reflect
on how your film turned out. Have the courage to evaluate your work not just
with a self-congratulatory eye, but also with a critical eye. Step back; pretend the film wasn't made
by you. Be exacting. Be demanding. Don't let yourself off the hook. Be
completely honest about your performance!
-
Turn in a hard copy of this statement the next class session after your film
screens
- Post this
to your blog with your film the day after your film screens
Overall response (2-3
paragraphs):
Write an
overall response to your film in 2-3 paragraphs: Were you successful at
achieving what you set out to achieve? What are you proud of? What would you do
differently if you could remake this piece? What did you learn?
This scene
means a lot to me on a personal level, and so I really wanted to do it justice
in this assignment. As I said in class, I kept thinking about what it’s like to
learn a song someone else wrote and then play it from your own heart. It gives
you a different type of connection that you don’t get hearing a song on the
radio. I felt like this was what happened for me on this assignment. I felt a
deeper connection with this scene for sure, but I also feel like I had my eyes
opened to new ways to tell a personal story even if the elements in the story
are foreign to you. For the most part, I thought I achieved what I set out to
do.
I felt that
there were several shots where we were able to get the timing down almost
perfectly, and while those felt good, the ones I really liked were the ones
where we had to make do with a change of location or other unforeseen event and
were able to adapt and communicate the same thing as the original film. I was
also proud of my organization for this shoot. I’m not saying things went perfectly,
but I felt that I was able to come to set more confident because of all the
paperwork and pre-visualization I did on this assignment.
If I had
the chance to do this again, I would have given my actors more of the back
story. I know that showing them animatics or clips isn’t always the best thing
to do, however for this assignment I think it would have helped, as well as
giving them more than a reader’s digest version of the story. There is a great
deal of back story that comes before this scene in the film, and if my actors
had been more familiar with it, I think it would have been easier for me to
communicate what I was going for. I would also have thought through the meaning
of each shot even more than I did, so that I would have noticed more of the
shots where we were framed just a little off.
Briefly discuss the following:
What, specifically, did you want to
communicate? Were you successful? Why? Why not?
I wanted to
convey the feeling of triumph over adversity that I feel when I watch this
scene. I love that Mortimer comes so close to death, and then with the help of
a friend is able to rebound and ultimately win the day. I think I communicated
this as much as is possible seeing the clip without much knowledge of the story.
The blown out skies behind Mortimer didn’t really light him the way I thought
they would where in the original you see him look like an avenging angel. So in
that sense, I don’t think I made as much of an impact as Leone, but I think it
was a step in the right direction for me as a filmmaker.
How, specifically, did you try to communicate
this?
As I stated
above, I really tried to match the framing and lighting on Mortimer exactly the
same as in the film. Of all the framing, I think on Mortimer I missed the most
correct angles and lens choices, which as I said probably weakened the overall
impact.
What did you learn about storytelling:
A few weeks
ago in class we discussed that it’s really only possible to utilize two or
three of the visual elements when it comes to filmmaking. I really feel like I
noticed this during this shoot. In essence, the shooting plan was already made
for us, we knew what we wanted things to capture, and yet, seeming small
elements like costumes, location, and the height of the actors constantly disrupted
to some degree, the plan we had in mind. If you want to tell a successful story,
it’s in small details that you can get your theme across. Things like costumes
matter, and can add or detract from your story in ways you might not consider
on paper.
What did you learn about working
with actors and getting performance:
Since my
scene didn’t have much dialogue (or physical motion from the actors), I really
noticed how important it is for actors to know the subtext of the scene.
Emoting from the eyes, or small facial ticks can speak volumes. Certainly Leone
accomplished this much more effectively than I did.
What did you learn about blocking
the camera and actors?
This whole exercise
made me want to write a scene, just so I could try and compose shots the way
Sergio Leone did in this film. It really dawned on me how much you can get out
of the story-especially a visual story-if you take time to block the actors,
and select the right lens.
What did you learn about visual
elements such as lighting, composition, framing, etc.?
I feel like
there were multiple times where Billy and I “corrected” the frame so that it
fell more in line with the rule of thirds, or some other “rule” like that, and
then once we looked at the frame from the film, we realized that it wasn’t
framed according to those guidelines, because the way it was framed originally did
more for the story than just show a good looking picture. I felt like this was
something I noticed in other classmate’s remakes as well. It really hit home to
me that even if you are someone who believes that “story is king”, you have to acknowledge
that for the story to be a great king, it needs to rule while paying attention
to those visual elements. (side note: I will try not to use quotations like
that ever again.)
What did you learn about design and
art direction?
Trying to
replicate what the characters looked like, and wore as costumes did a lot to
cover some of the other mistakes I made in creating this shot for shot, because
those designs do a lot to convey what these characters are about. Everything in
Mortimer’s shots are strait and clean, whereas El Indio is always at strange
angles. The both wear black, but even then the type of black clothes they wear
speaks volumes. Even tiny details like the type of holster, or the type of
facial hair can do a lot of the leg work for you as a storyteller.
What did you learn about the Production
Process such as pre-production, collaborating with crew, securing equipment,
etc.?
I learned that if you’ve done a solid job in pre-production,
you’ll have a greater chance of success. I’ve always kind of known that, but
since this was one of the most in depth pre-production plans I’ve ever made, I
really know it to be true now. I was lucky that everyone was willing to go the
extra mile on this shoot, and that was something that stood out to me as a
reason projects can be successful. If everyone has the same passion to complete
a project as you do, then not only will your collaboration be better, but your
final product will be stronger as well.
What was it
like to watch your film with an audience? Did they understand it? Miss the
point? Why did they respond the way they did?
This was a
fun one to watch with the class. I think everyone was able to understand what
was really going on, and if we had more time in class to discuss it, I would
have liked to have heard peoples interpretations. I think the fact that this
scene is so long and yet always interesting goes a long way in making people
invest, even if it’s just for the sweet relief when it’s over. I watched a
documentary in preparation for this where even Clint Eastwood talks about how
he thinks the scene is way too long. It seemed to me that everyone felt that
same anticipation while watching.
Any other observations or notes:
This was a
brutal assignment, but I feel like it was an exercise that made me a better
filmmaker. I would like to have another opportunity to dissect a scene like
this.
What camera did you use? Why? Ursa Mini 4.6k. Super 35mm film sensor which helped to create similar framing and use of focal lengths in Matt's film.
ReplyDeleteWhat lights did you use? Why? Only used a bounce because we shot outside and had a ton of natural light.
What did you learn technically? I learned the importance of having ND's on set. It would've helped with getting the background in some shots. I also got a good feeling for different kinds of focal lengths and the style of shots and feelings they can help to create.
What did you do well and what things can you improve on? I felt Matt and I had great synergy on set and worked really well together. I also felt we had a good idea of the focal lengths and the lines/compositions of the frame. I wish I had more help on set to get the shots faster and quicker. Also, checking the frame to make sure there were no rods or anything like that in the film.
What was it like to watch this with an audience? Was your work in focus? Did the director use your favorite takes? Why or why not? It was cool to see the reaction of the film to the audience. Matt did use my favorite takes and that was awesome. I felt like we got the shots towards the end of our takes and were successful in capturing what we set out to do.
Any other thoughts
It was just a really fun shoot and I was happy with how it turned out, despite my errors and mishaps.